OPINION | What does Rafael Nadal's Australian Open triumph mean for tennis's GOAT debate

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Rafael Nadal (Photo by Darrian Traynor/Getty Images)
Rafael Nadal (Photo by Darrian Traynor/Getty Images)

While watching Rafael Nadal's epic, five-hour and 24-minute win over Daniil Medvedev in the Australian Open final, one could be forgiven for thinking twice which player was the young gun.

For all his proclaimed physical discomforts, 35-year-old Nadal looked more like the 25 years of his opponent as the match wore on.

The Spaniard had entered the tournament with uncertainty, having been out of the game for six months with a damaging foot injury.

Support independent journalism
Get 14 days free to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Voting Booth
Would you be keen to see the Springboks join the Six Nations?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! The Northern Hemisphere is the future.
52% - 2544 votes
No! The Rugby Championship is still the pinnacle.
48% - 2308 votes
Vote