Proteas

SuperSport responds to Indian review complaints: 'No control over the Hawk-Eye technology'

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
India appeal for the wicker of Dean Elgar. (Photo by Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images)
India appeal for the wicker of Dean Elgar. (Photo by Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images)

Host broadcaster SuperSport said on Friday it had no control over the Decision Review System (DRS) used in the Test series between South Africa and India.

In a brief statement issued to AFP, the broadcaster said: "SuperSport notes comments made by certain members of the Indian cricket team.

"Hawk-Eye is an independent service provider, approved by the ICC and their technology has been accepted for many years as an integral part of DRS.

"SuperSport does not have any control over the Hawk-Eye technology."

Members of the Indian team reacted angrily on Thursday when a leg before wicket decision against South African captain Dean Elgar was overturned on review.

Several Indian players were heard complaining about the decision and there appeared to be suggestions the broadcaster was manipulating the technology.

There has been no indication yet from match referee Andy Pycroft and the International Cricket Council whether any disciplinary action will be taken against Indian captain Virat Kohli, vice-captain KL Rahul and bowler Ravichandran Ashwin, whose voices were heard through the stump microphone.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your views on the World Rugby men's Player of the Year nominations for 2021 not including any Springboks?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It's a disgrace! Both Siya Kolisi AND Eben Etzebeth should have been nominated!
39% - 6403 votes
Siya, at the very least, should have been included after a superb season
6% - 1017 votes
Etzebeth has been SA's best player this year and should feel hard done by
21% - 3477 votes
Get over it! Moaning about this just sounds like sour grapes!
33% - 5464 votes
Vote