Revisiting the colourism and pretty privilege conversation amid Pearl Thusi Twitter bedlam... again

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Pearl Thusi at the 2017 BET Awards at Microsoft Square on June 25, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)
Pearl Thusi at the 2017 BET Awards at Microsoft Square on June 25, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)

In case you needed a reminder from a previous W24 article about colourism; "the term colourism describes prejudice or discrimination among people of the same ethnicity against individuals with a dark skin tone. It is a problem that has been going on for decades, if not centuries and it is evident across the globe."

READ MORE: Dear Indian people, we need to talk about your unhealthy obsession with fair skin 

And then another reminder from an article I wrote about pretty privilege (once again); "usually we are unaware of our [relative] privileges. They are such a normal part of our daily lives that we don't even consider them privileges. So much so that when someone calls us out on any of them we feel attacked". 

This week, we saw a collision happening at the intersection of the two points above when local TV personality, Pearl Thusi, became overcome by emotions on the BET Africa show, 'Behind the Story' that she hosts, very carelessly saying; "I can't change how I look" and in not so many words, conceding that it is, in fact, pretty privilege that "feeds [her] kids".

This, in conversation with Khanyi Mbau whose cosmetic choices are the result of assimilation to the social injustices of colourism. And this is a matter Khanyi has not shied away from speaking on; hence her willingness to appear on 'Behind the Story' with Pearl. 

Watch the short clip of the interview that has since sparked chaos on social media below: 

READ MORE: Skin bleaching in 2019 - why are people still doing it and what are the dangers?

In 2019, the Queen Sono leading lady had also expressed her discontent at having been overlooked for certain roles because of her skin tone. 

Of course, this was not received well on social media, and a warranted wave of backlash washed through Twitter for the rest of the week. More than the usual banter South Africans usually employ as a coping mechanism on Twitter in the midst of a furore, this particular one came with a lot of education and critical discussions, where award-winning artist Sho Madjozi even engaged.

As a result, the parallels between the two local stars' contributions to the colourism and pretty privilege conversation were drawn, highlighting how two people who benefit from the same system can use their privilege to either be an apologist or an ally.

Ultimately, the crux of the three-day-long debate was not to discount the fact that Pearl Thusi is a hardworking actress and presenter who has earned her gigs and flowers, but it was to shed light on an ongoing issue in the entertainment industry - that being, the favour lighter skin grants you over your dark-skinned industry peers. 

This is not be misconstrued as an observation that implies that light-skinned, conventionally attractive women are not genuinely talented, but rather to bring to the fore awareness about how the goalposts are shifted to the disadvantage of equally gifted people who just happen to have darker skin. 

READ MORE: When pretty privilege gives your opinion more value 

And this privilege isn't just confined to the entertainment industry - we see it play out in everyday situations too. I am personally aware of the fact that there are certain things my light skin has afforded me that I may not have otherwise been exposed to had I been a dark-skinned woman. 

And if a dark-skinned person draws my attention to this, I'm in no position to be defensive about that because it would be dismissive of their experiences. This is a no-brainer and the awareness thereof needs no applause.

This is why I thought it appropriate to bring up former W24 writer's - Phumela Dayimani - personal experiences of colourism as a dark-skinned woman. 

It was three years ago when she wrote the below, and it still rings true today:

Almost every dark-skinned woman has at one point, hated herself

I wouldn’t say that I have hated myself for being dark-skinned, but there have been times that I wished I had a lighter complexion. And I'm not the only one. We were taught that lighter equalled prettier, smarter and more desirable and like any young person, I had my insecurities.

Colour was the main one.  

I once watched a video of a psychologist doing a doll test on children. In the video, two dolls of different skin colours are put on the table and children of different races are asked different questions about the dolls. 

One of the questions was "which doll is prettier?"

Without fail they all pointed at the lighter one. When asked why they chose that doll again they all answered with: “It's white.”

The fact that children grow up with these misconceptions and hating their skin tones makes me ache in the deepest part of my soul. You can watch the video here

READ MORE: Why the comments about Thando Thabethe's Cosmo cover expose colourism in SA

Social media reflects our colourist attitudes

Social media has become a platform where people practice colourism. “ When girls are dark, boys are few,”  “ Dark skinned girls be like...”

People post these on social media, and we laugh and entertain these posts without realising that the younger generation will grow up believing that beauty is measured by the colour of one’s skin.

There was even a time when we even used to divide ourselves in groups with hashtags like #TeamLightSkin or #TeamDarkSkin.

We need to evaluate why we lighten our selfies, why skin-lightening is a thing and why we ascribe certain behaviours to certain complexions. Saying things like “she’s pretty for someone so dark” or “she thinks she’s pretty because she is light-skinned” needs to stop. 

The only way to end this is to start by evaluating ourselves. We need to quietly check ourselves. 

Follow us on social media: FacebookTwitterInstagram

Sign up to W24's newsletter so that you don't miss out on any of our stories and giveaways.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Do you think it's important to get married in this day and age?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, it's important in order to create a family unit and for companionship
23% - 938 votes
Not at all. Being single is far more liberating
9% - 376 votes
There is no general answer to this, it's each to their own
49% - 2056 votes
Yes, society still frowns on unmarried people, especially women
1% - 58 votes
It depends on whether you are able to find a compatible partner
18% - 732 votes