Gucci does blackface again with a balaclava turtle neck

accreditation
Gucci balaclava
Gucci balaclava

After a rollercoaster of cultural appropriation accusations in previous year’s uproars, it seems like in 2019 luxury fashion brands have moved on to blackface as a preferred form of racial offence. 

Gucci is the latest brand to aestheticise blackface (urg), following Prada’s lead with its ‘Sambo’-resembling trinkets released and recalled in December last year.

READ MORE: Dolce & Gabbana in boiling hot water yet again over offensive merchandise

Gucci joining the bandwagon of reproducing racist imagery of black people honestly has us sounding like broken records. At this point these designer brands are taking turns on the racist train.

READ MORE: What exactly does Katy Perry mean by "exotic" shoe designs?

From Katy Perry’s "exotic design" shoe collection to repeat offenders, Dolce & Gabbana's chronic racism, we find ourselves asking this question once again: why do these brands keep missing mark?

The Gucci “balaclava” turtle necks do not go down well and Twitter users were quick to say Gucci should come correct:

Year after year, decade after decade, we have to continuously remind western conglomerates that the black community has to be respected socially, culturally and economically. Yet, here we are again, in 2019, raising issues of basic decency.

Sizakele Marutlulle, CEO and founder of Marutlulle & Co – a pan-African strategy and ideas lab – weighs in on the issue of Gucci and other like brands.

READ MORE: Dolce & Gabbana in boiling hot water yet again over offensive merchandise

According to Sizakele, these brands “do not care about doing the real work of understanding rather than ‘chasing fads’… until there is a boycott, not Twitter uproar, the brands won’t change.”

Gucci was swift with its apology saying they have pulled the products from stores but some Twitter users were not convinced.

“Apologies are often about ‘getting caught’ not about ‘causing offence’ so what is needed is retributive justice for those offended not a full page ad in the Sunday press,” says Sizakele.

“Gucci has been here before,” she adds. “They stole ideas from Dapper Dan and now have him in their ads as though there was respect all along. Please remember that not all people are conscious consumers, so others do not really reflect deeply about a brand’s purpose, messaging etc.”

READ MORE: Fashion Nova has released a range of sexy geisha costumes for Halloween and people aren't happy about the cultural appropriation

“Boycott not burn stores, says Sizakele, “hit them where it matters”.

Black people does have economic agency, and while it may seem like a big ask for many, withholding financial support from commercial brands may contribute to enforcing accountability.

 Do you have any ideas about what should be done about racist brands and their products? Chat to us here.

Sign up to W24’s newsletters so you don't miss out on any of our hot stories and giveaways.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, I believed it was authentic
7% - 151 votes
Yes, I didn't want to spend that much money on the original item
20% - 472 votes
No, I always shop at reputable stores
14% - 334 votes
No, I don't wear designer clothing
59% - 1350 votes
Vote