It's not just us: authors who hated the movie version of their books


Bibliophiles are a strange bunch.

The love-hate relationship we have with book to movie adaptations often sees us swinging the pendulum between excitement to see how favourite works of literature will be brought to screen, terror that they won’t live up to our expectations and downright contempt when producers and directors just get it so very wrong.

But, it turns out that it’s not just the readers who feel so strongly about their favourite books brought to screen.

Established and popular authors have publically expressed their love and loathing for movie versions of their own books, with opinions ranging from the movies not capturing the authenticity of the book, to issues with casting and overall production.

Here’s a list of writers who haven’t been shy to reveal how much they loathe the film adaptations of their novels:

READ MORE: Bollywood movies taught me so many life lessons - here are some you might not expect

WATCH: V for Vendetta trailer

Alan Moore  - V for Vendetta

The graphic novelist has actually loathed most of the screen adaptations of his works, which include Watchmen and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen but V for Vendetta gets a special mention because according to, he despised the film so much that he asked to be removed from the credits of the movie and refused to accept any money for it.

According to, the author is, in actual fact, also a not a big fan of modern film, labelling it as “bullying” and adds that it “waters down cultural imagination.” With that attitude, it’s hardly surprising that he’d hate the films.

WATCH: Queen of the Damned trailer

Queen of the Damned by Anne Rice

The author, who has been making waves for all the wrong reasons over the last couple of years, was apparently initially optimistic about this movie.

She previously had issues with the casting of Interview with the Vampire – she disliked Tom Cruise in the role of Lestat but eventually came around, and even praised it afterwards.

Queen of the Damned (I think I may be in the minority because I actually enjoyed this one) was a different case altogether. Her initial optimism disappeared after seeing the final product. According to she appealed to fans to forget about the disastrous movie and said that it “hurt her to see her work being mutilated”  the way Queen of the Damned has been.

READ MORE: More diverse comics you should read after Black Panther

WATCH: Earthsea miniseries trailer

Earthsea miniseries adaptation by Ursula K. Le Guin

Okay, so technically we’re cheating a bit here because this wasn’t a movie, but more a series, yet it still counts because the late and much beloved author apparently was really not happy with what they did to her popular sci-fi series.

In fact, she wrote an op-ed featured on that bashed the show, calling folk out for whitewashing her characters, using scenes from her books in different ways that ended up creating a completely different plot and ignored the fact that race was a central point of her novel.

She also took exception to the fact that Danny Glover was the only person of colour in the series, and accused the show of being a mix of violence and sex with no meaningful plot.

WATCH: The Shining Trailer

The Shining by Stephen King

It’s never been a secret that the King of Horror loathed Stanley Kubrick’s rendition of The Shining. King’s main complaint was that the movie changed so much of the essence of the book, and downplayed the supernatural overtones by transferring the evil onto the characters instead of showing the Overlook Hotel as a villainous force.

According to, King was also unhappy with Jack Nicholson’s portrayal of the protagonist, since in the book he only becomes insane when he’s at the hotel, and it doesn’t start off with him being evil and crazy.

And let’s not forget how different the ending is.

READ MORE: 5 movie endings that were wildly different from their book's version

Sign up to W24’s newsletters so you don't miss out on any of our hot stories and giveaways.   

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Do you think it's important to get married in this day and age?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, it's important in order to create a family unit and for companionship
22% - 512 votes
Not at all. Being single is far more liberating
9% - 219 votes
There is no general answer to this, it's each to their own
49% - 1126 votes
Yes, society still frowns on unmarried people, especially women
1% - 34 votes
It depends on whether you are able to find a compatible partner
18% - 422 votes