'Cute Black Baby' social media accounts post doctored pictures of infants - why this is concerning

A baby girl pictured with her father.
A baby girl pictured with her father.

It's not unusual for active social media users to use FaceTune and the likes to do a virtual nip/tuck job on some of their pictures before posting them on social media.

If anything, it's become common practice, especially in the beauty blogger/vlogger and makeup artist community where photo editing apps are used to enhance colours rather than to "deceive" (for lack of a better term).

READ MORE: Urban Decay showed models with “real skin” and the internet is loving it

However, these photo editing apps are sometimes used to portray what some would call an "unrealistic" image of one's appearance. This is why they remain a highly contentious issue in an industry that is only now trying to subvert the harmful effects of decades' long beauty standards that have been on imposed young girls and women. 

And honestly, it's okay to give yourself clearer skin, plus curves here and there because what you do with your own images is your business. But perhaps the issue is when people in positions of influence feed that image to us as a true portrayal of what they look like - it's an unhealthy diet for any impressionable minds to be living on.

This is why certain celebrities have gone on social media fasts, suggested that photo editing apps be banned, and visual projects such as #SelfieHarm exist.

READ MORE: This project challenged young girls to edit their images until they were social media ready and the results highlight #selfieharm

So why then has the manipulation of images now trickled all the way down to baby photos? 

Posting images of minors on public platforms is already stepping on iffy territory, and editing their images to achieve "perfection" is highly disconcerting. 

You may be familiar with social media accounts such as Cute Black Babies on Twitter and @igslaykids on Instagram, which share pictures of toddlers who are indeed very adorable and well dressed. These sort of accounts are like crack for your uterus - proceed with caution. 

READ MORE: Do we put celebrity parents under pressure to share pictures of their children online?

But recently, a not-so-feel-good side of accounts of this nature has been exposed. It would appear that some of the baby posts we goo-goo gaga over are not accurate representations of these black infants and toddlers, as they have been photoshopped to make them look racially ambiguous or mixed, according to this Twitter user's thread:

When this thread fast gained traction, a few other users remarked about the unsettling obsession with mixed babies, where one user who used to be a social worker recalled that the foster agency they worked for seemed to be prioritising mixed children;

Apparently the objective behind these doctored images of black babies is to benefit the interracial dating cyber community, where couples hope to one day manufacture mixed race offspring, Kardashian Klan style. And the word "manufacture" is used intentionally in this context. 

View this post on Instagram


A post shared by Kim Kardashian West (@kimkardashian) on

Speaking of the Kardashians, Khloe's daughter True Thompson, was subjected to colourism very soon after her doting mom shared a picture of her on social media in 2018. She was ridiculed for being slightly darker than her cousins Stormi and Chicago.

View this post on Instagram

?? The Triplets ??

A post shared by Kim Kardashian West (@kimkardashian) on

This might be why Khloe - who's also had to deal with her fair share of body image issues - started using FaceTune and various filters on True's pictures until recently. 

View this post on Instagram

??Happy One Month True ??

A post shared by Khloé (@khloekardashian) on

All of this is indicative of not only colourism, but how the privileges associated with racial ambiguity as well as proximity to whiteness have created a social media culture that renders their beauty top tier over the rest, and it now also affects children. 

The babies may be unaware now, but what impact will this have on the way they see themselves when they grow up? 

In a previous article on W24 about the pressure fans put on celebrities to share their babies online, a Durban-based psychologist explained how "everything we post contributes to our child’s online reputation – a record of shared pictures and comments that’s virtually impossible to delete," further adding that "it’s easy to ‘label’ your child through your posts, presenting them as a particular ‘type’, even when this doesn’t accurately reflect their personality." 

In this case, it would be the child's appearance, which we all know plays a huge role in self-esteem, especially with girl children who often have beauty standards imposed on them from a very early age.

Parent24 also weighed in on the dangers of sharenting earlier this year, expressing that it's not necessarily parents who are at fault for sharing moments with their kids online, but rather it's audiences and companies who have other (sometimes) sinister intentions as they said "sharenting tells them what your child looks like, when she was born, what she likes to do, when she hits her developmental milestones and more. These platforms pursue a business model predicated on knowing users – perhaps more deeply than they know themselves – and using that knowledge to their own ends."

And this is exactly the model that the kids_slay Instagram account was operating on before a good Samaritan took over the account. This account was adding 'Eurocentric' features to black babies in order to create a desire for mixed race kids, which would in turn ensure that the online interracial dating market expands enough for their sister app (below) to gain more users. 

the dangers of sharenting

The @kids_slay account which was editing baby pictures to push a mixed race baby agenda has since rebranded under new management and had its bio changed to the following PSA;

People need to stop being overly obsessed with mixed kids. ps. I took this user so the weirdos cant get it back

Sign up to W24’s newsletters so you don't miss out on any of our hot stories and giveaways.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Do you think it's important to get married in this day and age?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, it's important in order to create a family unit and for companionship
23% - 929 votes
Not at all. Being single is far more liberating
9% - 372 votes
There is no general answer to this, it's each to their own
49% - 2036 votes
Yes, society still frowns on unmarried people, especially women
1% - 56 votes
It depends on whether you are able to find a compatible partner
18% - 728 votes