Who speaks for you?

accreditation

Quick.

Think of a leader, any leader, internationally or locally who stands out from the noise and political debris caroming around.

Think of someone who is the embodiment of what we all seek in a leader, someone with vision, integrity, compassion, resolve and who holds the interest of fellow human beings at heart.

Not easy now that Nelson Mandela is in retirement and no longer engages with issues that plague the contemporary world.  And all that’s left of Mother Theresa are her sandals and her blue and white cotton sari in some museum showcase. Of course her order, the Missionaries of Charity, still operates around the globe.

The closest I can come to thinking of an international figure who represents the qualities many of us agree make a good leader is US president Barack Obama. Of course the growing and gathering Tea Party movement in opposition to the Obama admistration’s changes to health care in that country, among other things, would disagree.

Years ago, the conservative Italian political journalist Oriana Fallaci, published a collection of interviews with 14 20th century world leaders including Yasir Arafat, Indira Gandhi, Willy Brandt and Henry Kissinger.

In the preface to her 1977 book, Interview with History, she writes about meeting these powerful people.

“When I was finally in their presence, I had to exert myself to keep them there longer than an hour or half hour. Once there, however, it became a game to reach the truth and discover that not even a selective criterion justified their power. Those who determine our destiny are not really better than ourselves, they are neither more intelligent nor stronger nor more enlightened than ourselves. If anything, they are more enterprising, more ambitious.”

Nothing’s changed really.

We still expect leaders to be smarter or better than us to hold our interests at heart and to act on our behalf.
But we’re less gullible.

Or are we?

Of course there are countless people on the outside of mainstream politics who struggle for justice and who still inspire us.
There’s Burma’s Aung San Suu Kyi, Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, there are activists like South Africa’s Zackie Achmat and religious leaders with moral authority like Bishop Desmond Tutu.

There are environmental organisations, organisations that mobilise against human trafficking, against blood diamonds, against despotic regimes across the globe that speak for or on behalf of billions of people who share their concerns.

But what all the abovementioned individuals or organisations have in common is that they work outside of formal politics and mobilize against power and government.

It seems once you step into the viper’s den you can no longer represent those who elected you to that position but become beholden to potent systemic and irresistible forces that swirl about the powerful and those in power.

If you listen carefully to the mealy-mouthed excuses, explanations and speeches on a variety of issues and that float from the mouths of those who would claim to represent and lead us, it is sometimes difficult to find a point of connection either emotionally or intellectually.

And so it is that the language of a political clique can so easily become the language of the people.

But luckily there is a clear and obvious disjuncture between what leaders say and their actions and it is in this gap that we begin to see more clearly.
Modern society is so fractured and compartmentalized that we can find other spaces, places and people who represent what we feel and think.
For example, the country’s fine artists, cartoonists, theatre and filmmakers, writers and musicians are articulating much of what we feel.

It is wonderful to listen to the number of music mixes made of Julius Malema’s incomprehensible outburst during a press conference in Luthuli house shortly after his visit to Zimbabwe. The language he chose; “white tendency”, “bloody agent”, and “bastard” is so clearly Zanu-PF inspired.

If you need cheering up listen to this wonderful Revolutionary House mix of Bloody Agent

So who, if anyone, speaks for you?

Is it the ANCYL’s Julius Malema, is it Helen Zille, or maybe National Secretary of the Young Communist League, Buti Manamela? Is it Cosatu’s Zwelenzima Vavi or President Jacob Zuma?

Does Women24 speak for you? The Sowetan, The Mail and Guardian? Or maybe it is Karen Zoid, Die Antwoord, Tribal Echo, HHP?
 


 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Do you think it's important to get married in this day and age?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, it's important in order to create a family unit and for companionship
23% - 910 votes
Not at all. Being single is far more liberating
9% - 362 votes
There is no general answer to this, it's each to their own
49% - 1980 votes
Yes, society still frowns on unmarried people, especially women
1% - 55 votes
It depends on whether you are able to find a compatible partner
18% - 715 votes
Vote