Like most of the fashion industry, there’s a blind spot in Country Road’s ethical focus

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Models walk the runway during the Closing runway show of Melbourne Fashion Week on November 21, 2021 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)
Models walk the runway during the Closing runway show of Melbourne Fashion Week on November 21, 2021 in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)
  • Country Road workers, mostly women, in Australia were on strike in pursuit of better wages and working conditions and have since reached a resolution as of this week. 
  • But, how could a company highly regarded for its commitment to sustainability as Country Road is have provoked staff to go on strike? 
  • Country Road Group scores better on environmental sustainability than on worker empowerment, which suggests the company has a blind spot in addressing concerns about labour conditions in its supply chain. 


Amid the catwalk shows and millinery workshops, a key theme of this year’s Melbourne Fashion Week was sustainablity, “offering designers with strong ethical foundations an opportunity to join our runways, or opening up dialogue on sustainability into our talks program”.

Events during the week included industry representatives discussing “shifting the status quo” and moving “beyond greenwashing”.

On the panel at the latter event was Eloise Bishop, head of sustainability at Country Road Group, one of Australia’s largest specialty fashion retailers. Meanwhile workers from the company were on strike, chaining themselves together and staging other protests outside Country Road stores in pursuit of better wages and working conditions.

READ MORE | Fashion in a post-Covid era demands a deviation from uninspired churning out of collections 

Among the complaints of these workers, mostly women from the company’s distribution warehouse in Melbourne’s west, was being paid an average of A$23 an hour, compared to about A$30 for workers doing similar work at the Pacific Brands warehouse across the road.

On Monday the workers returned to work after reaching an agreement with the company that includes improved job security, union recognition and a 13.3% pay rise over four years. That’s about an extra $3 an hour.

While this has brought the strike to a celebratory end, questions remain. How could a company so highly regarded for its commitment to sustainability have provoked staff to strike for almost a fortnight?

Lower marks for worker empowerment

Country Road Group is a subsidiary of South Africa’s Woolworths Holdings Ltd (which also owns David Jones). The company’s clothing brands include Country Road, Witchery, Trenery, Politix and Mimco. Despite the pandemic, in the past fiscal year Country Road Group’s sales grew by 13.5% to A$1.05 billion.

The company is considered by many an industry leader on ethics and sustainability. The 2021 Ethical Fashion Guide compiled by Baptist World Aid, for example, awarded it an overall “A” grade. It did well on four of five rating criteria, scoring an “A+” on its policies and governance, “A+” for trading and risk, “A” for supplier relationships and human rights monitoring, and another “A” for environmental sustainability.

On worker empowerment, however, it scored just a “C”.

READ MORE | Sustainability must start with universities if the fashion industry is to change 

These results suggest the company has a blind spot in addressing concerns about labour conditions in its supply chain.

Country Road Group scores better on environmental sustainability than worker empowerment.

Country Road Group scores better on environmental sustainability than on worker empowerment. Nick-D/WikimediaCC BY


Supply-chain blind spots

In part because of the disparities between how the fashion industry markets its products and the way workers are treated, the global fashion industry is a notorious example of exploitation engendered by opaque supply chains.

Questions about ethics become divided across asymmetrical lines: the global North as fashion consumer and the global South as fashion producer.

Attempts to bring greater transparency and accountability to these supply chains include Australia’s Modern Slavery Act. This requires large companies to submit an annual statement to a public registry outlining efforts to identify and eliminate the risk of exploitative labour practices.

Country Road Group’s 2020 Modern Slavery statement states the company is “committed to upholding the highest social, ethical and environmental standards in its supply chains”.

But commitment to ethics is arguably easier when the “problem” of labour rights is far away and things like modern slavery statements (which rely on third party auditing) can help to conceal unethical practices. What happens when the issue is on our doorstep?

READ MORE | Adidas commits to sustainable fashion, fostering an eco-friendly environment in new store 

Fair pay for all

We often think about the concept of a “living wage” in relation to garment workers overseas. But these warehouse workers told their union representatives they could not afford to live on the wages paid by Country Road Group, much less clothe themselves or their children in the very garments they pick and pack at the warehouse.

According to industry body the Australian Fashion Council, 77% of the 489,000 workers employed in Australia’s fashion and textile industry’s workforce are female. This makes fair pay and conditions in the industry an important driver of women’s economic advancement. Industrial action is about more than money; it is about respect and recognition.

Responsibility for change in the fashion industry is frequently feminised. Women are not only the primary workforce; they are at the front lines of sustainable action, consumer activism and labour rights movements. It was a proposed strike by members of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union in New York in 1909 that led to the establishment of International Women’s Day.

The move towards sustainability and ethical production in the fashion industry is necessary. But if action does not extend to the realities of all workers across the supply chain, the rhetoric is empty.

Note: co-author Lauren Kate Kelly is a researcher with the United Workers’ Union, which covers Country Road warehouse employees.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article

Follow us on social media: FacebookTwitterInstagram.

Sign up to W24’s newsletters so you don't miss out on any of our stories and giveaways.

The Conversation

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, I believed it was authentic
7% - 427 votes
Yes, I didn't want to spend that much money on the original item
20% - 1250 votes
No, I always shop at reputable stores
13% - 802 votes
No, I don't wear designer clothing
60% - 3692 votes
Vote