Draft guidelines in the South African automotive aftermarket industry a 'threat to road safety standards'

accreditation
Image: iStock
Image: iStock

The Competition Commission published draft Guidelines for Competition in the South African Automotive Aftermarket Industry for public comment last week.

Mark Dommisse, national chairperson of the National Automobile Dealers’ Association (NADA) says: “We have reviewed the draft guidelines published by the Commission, and following careful consideration, we have not been able to identify the pro-consumer or inherently transformative nature of the draft guidelines and have no choice but to unilaterally reject the guidelines as they are totally unworkable in their current form. We are simply unable to support the draft guidelines. 

“In our considered view, the guidelines have serious negative consequences, not just for Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) and dealers, but for consumers and our nation’s road safety initiatives. There is no attempt to even address these unintended consequences of the draft guidelines."


How will the proposed amendments affect you as the consumer? Email us.

mechanic,workshop

                       Image: Getty

No consideration

Dommisse continues: "Additionally, it is disheartening to see that none of the constructive input provided by NADA to the Commission over a three-year period of earnest engagement, including on the previously published draft codes, has been considered. NADA takes great exception to the statements published by the Commission of anti-competitive behaviour by our members. To say that our members conduct their business in an anti-competitive manner is completely untrue."

“If this were true, the Commission is duty bound to investigate each and every complaint made and take remedial action against those firms found to be in contravention of the Competition Act. Broadstroke allegations with no substantiation are contrary to a constitutional democracy and the compact between regulator and regulated. Moreover, this creates mistrust with consumers and undermines the integrity of the industry as a whole."

READ: Good news! SA is a step closer to servicing your new car at an independent workshop

“We strongly believe that Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) and importers have the right to determine the standards of those that service their products in much the same way that Airbus and other aircraft OEMs do with aircraft, and the strict maintenance thereof.

“As retailers, distributors and as authorised representatives of the OEMs and importers, we perform a highly competitive, valuable and technical service, which has led to enormous choice in the sector through major investment by our members."

                       Image: iStock

Safety and reliability

“Importantly, we bring to the buying public’s attention, that we interpret the guidelines published as being anti-consumer and a threat to road safety standards in South Africa. NADA members and OEMs comply with strict technical and parts standards, to ensure transparency and the best safety outcomes for our consumers.

“It is extremely important to emphasise that the sale, maintenance, repair and operation of a motor vehicle is ultimately about safety and reliability, which also underpins the future value of the vehicle. 

“Last week’s published draft guidelines call for structural changes which will fundamentally compromise the existing franchise dealer business model and have a direct negative impact on employment stability within the industry. It will be virtually impossible to effectively implement and regulate these guidelines."

READ: CAR DOCTOR | My car is making a funny noise at the front right wheel, what is it? - reader

"We have always maintained in engagements with the Commission that transformation of the automotive value-chain is an imperative and that we are willing to work with relevant stakeholders to craft a way forward that is pro-consumer, enhances the already competitive landscape, recognizes existing investments and avoids free-riding. 

“In addition, we have serious concerns that the Commission’s guidelines are counterproductive to the Automotive Master Plan 2035 and consequently could impact negatively on future investment. We, nonetheless, welcome the opportunity for all stakeholders in the automotive industry to come together with the Commission to develop an ambitious and workable solution,” concludes Dommisse.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Brought to you by
Voting Booth
Who do you feel was at fault for Verstappen and Hamilton's Italian GP crash?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Verstappen
25% - 1214 votes
Hamilton
42% - 2037 votes
They were both at fault
33% - 1585 votes
Vote