Nico Rosberg questions why Lewis Hamilton did not 'close the damn door' on Max Verstappen

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Lewis Hamilton (left) and Max Verstappen
Lewis Hamilton (left) and Max Verstappen

• Lewis Hamilton lost the lead of the French Grand Prix to Max Verstappen on the penultimate lap.

• With the win, Verstappen extended his championship lead over Hamilton.

• Former champion Nico Rosberg believes Hamilton should have done more to protect the position.

For more motoring stories, go to Wheels24


Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton feels it was "pointless" trying to defend his lead on Sunday (20 June) when being passed by title rival Max Verstappen. Hamilton found himself on the opposite side of the same situation which unfolded back at round four in Barcelona, having to defend himself from a two-stopping Max Verstappen who was able to cruise past on the penultimate lap of the French Grand Prix.

Hamilton's overall defence from the hunter Verstappen drew criticism from Sky F1 pundit Nico Rosberg as he felt his former team mate was too "soft" in giving up the lead.

Rosberg said: "Unusual from Lewis… close the damn door, no? Usually Lewis is like the best one-to-one racer and I'm surprised he didn't try. At least try and brake late and keep him on the outside, so a bit soft there from Lewis somehow."


Do you agree with Rosberg that Hamilton should have done more against Verstappen? Email us your thoughts or use the comment section below.


Nothing weak

The very first question put to Hamilton in the post-race conference from the press was inevitably about Rosberg's comments, but Hamilton did not think there was anything particularly weak about his defence.

Hamilton, when explaining his actions in the closing stages of the French Grand Prix, said: "Firstly, there's marbles on the inside, so I didn't want to make my tyres any worse than they already were. He had the DRS open, so if he didn't pass me there, he would have passed me the straight afterwards, so it would have made zero difference and I just had no front end, so he would have got me either way.

"It was pointless to defend any harder. I think you saw what happened to Valtteri - just ended up going straight on. So, there was no point messing up the tyres any more. Two-stop, probably… two-stop would potentially have done the job but it was not on the cards at all for us, so we'll do some analysis and try to figure out why."

READ: Great calls and brilliant racing - Verstappen gets the better of Hamilton in France

But even if Hamilton had been switched to a two-stop, he still thinks it would have been very difficult to hold off Verstappen and Red Bull.

He added: "I'm sure if we look, with hindsight, for sure if we had stopped earlier, before they had stopped, come out ahead, and just gone onto a two-stop, probably could have won the race - but it would have still been very difficult. Their pace was generally very, very strong. I was able to keep them at bay when he was behind me but if he had not made a mistake in Turn 1, they would have just led the race all the way, probably."

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
Who do you think is the better F1 driver between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Lewis Hamilton
35% - 477 votes
Max Verstappen
65% - 889 votes
Vote