Did Zuma compromise South Africa’s sovereignty for personal gain?

2017-04-20 18:01

Anti-Zuma forces would do well to emphasize the matter of sovereignty. They’re on shakier ground over corruption. Voices on the left and right can see that the whole game is pretty corrupt and has been for some time. Whites who got rich during white rule are in no position to talk about corruption. And nor are those who got rich during Mbeki’s and Mandela’s rule, e.g. Ramaphosa. Best to leave that issue and move swiftly along to the one that hurts Zuma most – sovereignty.

Did Zuma compromise South Africa’s political and economic sovereignty for personal gain? I’ve yet to come across a coherent argument that refutes the charge. I’ve heard appeals for caution, for patience, for lateral thinking, for intellectual gymnastics, but I haven’t seen a shred of proof to refute the serious allegation that Zuma regards South Africa’s sovereignty as an exchangeable commodity. Like chiefs of yore bargained away their sovereign and sacred land for beads and trinkets, he has traded South Africa’s sovereignty for cash.

I have heard some hints that the Guptas are doing good by bringing more Africans into the economy and sharing ownership with them. It would be interesting to see a balanced survey showing if the Guptas have indeed been strong on African empowerment. If not they’re going to run out of money trying to bribe their way to legitimacy.

Pravin Gordhan spoke directly to the ANC Youth League at Ahmed Kathrada’s memorial when he said: “If unity has been bought with paper bags of cash it’s not unity.” Or words to that effect. Of course Zuma and his supporters will start to attack the financiers. All populists do that when they run out of money. But you may as well berate the sea for being salty. In the modern age finance is king and will be for a while longer.

The ANC, or Malema, or whoever wants to push the agenda of radical economic transformation (really ‘normalisation’ given how racially skewed things are) should do so from a position of sovereignty. The African elite must work out how the cream gets scooped off the top and who gets what. And then they should stick to the agreement. If they break ranks it doesn’t mean someone was being disloyal. It means someone got greedy.

Zuma got greedy. If he’d gone to the African elite for ideas on how to secure his financial future he most probably would have got away with it.

News24 Voices Terms & Conditions

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

AB praises selfless skipper

2010-11-21 18:15

Inside News24

 
/News
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.