The oppressed can never be illegitimate

2016-07-14 18:45

Professor Adam Habib, the Vice-Chancellor of Wits University said in January when students were protesting for free registration: “this strike is conducted by only 30 people who are disrupting registration and learning and it is therefore illegitimate”. The same sentiment was sort of repeated by NMMU recently when the opening of its 2nd semester was halt by a student and workers protest when it released a statement stating: “staff and students are advised not to come to North & South campuses today due to a protests”.

Of course these cannot go unchallenged. The NMMU statement is clearly attempting to criminalize the “others” who are “not” staff and students who are protesting. It is doing this by asking staff and students not to come to campus because of a protest as if those conducting the protest are not students and staff. It is the old tactic of the liberal system which alienates everything and everybody outside the class bracket it was inaugurated to serve which are the rich, the white and the male in the main.

A protest is called by those who feel the oppressive weight of a violent system unto them and obviously if this violent system was formed to serve white rich males, then in contrast the oppressed who are attempting to re-humanise themselves with the protest will be the poor, black and unprotected students and workers. In other words, the NMMU statement was saying “the human beings called students and staff that we were designed to serve must not come to campus because there are black sub-humans who have closed gates protesting for what was not made for them”.

Prof Habib is not far from what NMMU was stating. His assertion of illegitimacy is questionable if not a fallacy. He first plays the mathematics game of saying, because a protest is organized by 30 people, it is therefore illegitimate yet he is the same person who goes around saying that he was a revolutionary in his student days when he and “a few other comrades” would disrupt university classes and burn colonial buildings under apartheid. This cosmetic activism is a sentiment mentioned repeatedly by other Vice Chancellors, professors and archbishops who claim to have been involved in the apartheid struggle. In other words, it was legitimate, revolutionary and “an act of bravery” for them to be 5 or 12 confronting apartheid machinery but illegitimate for students in 2016 when they are now university managers.

I have always emphasized that a social movement, no matter how big or small it is, no matter if it is successful or not, there is a message that it is communicating with us which we must pay attention to. The people participating in the protest are not stupid or causing inconvenience as some commentators would like to make us believe. Instead, people participating in a protest are intellectuals of note. They are thinking and are in pain. They articulate their oppression and tactic to their freedom. They are a group that is coming up with theory about their condition. If you take politics, history & context into consideration, it was suffering and a social movement that produced giants of liberation literature in Steve Biko, Frantz Fanon, Malcolm X, Chris Hani and Robert Sobukwe but to name a few. Today that theory that oppressors tried to crush is being cited to produce Ph.D scholars and is a source of inspiration and political education to the youth. That can never ever be illegitimate.

Now this brings me to a question that we must ask ourselves and seek to answer quickly which is: Between an oppressed student protesting and a Vice Chancellor presiding over a violent system, who is illegitimate? Or rather lets bring the question closer to home and ask: Between a poor citizen protesting for service delivery and a government official presiding over a corrupt state, who is illegitimate? Or lets put it even much more easier and ask: Between a Solomon Mahlangu hanged fighting for freedom and a PW Botha presiding over the apartheid machinery, who is illegitimate? Can the oppressed ever be illegitimate? Can we honestly say that an oppressed, poor, dehumanized, excluded, black and frustrated student is illegitimate or are they reacting from being at the painful receiving end of polished illegitimacy?

Prof Habib is running a university system that is a superstructure built in an upper class suburb which entrenches violence to anyone below the class bracket it was created to serve and NMMU is no different. A system that places a price tag on a human right called education and operates daily on a Eurocentric and white standardized infrastructure and curriculum will always be dehumanizing to the African working class student AND African working class worker because they cannot relate to it. It does not speak to their norms, values and standards because it was initially not created for them. It dehumanizes them. The act of denying access to education, evicting students from residence, withholding exam results of poor students, delaying the minimum wage and insourcing of workers etc – all these acts are intended to hurt, damage and dehumanize the African poor and working class student and worker in the main. It is in itself a crushing, brutal and evil act of violence by a superstructure to innocent human beings. Who is illegitimate between innocent human beings and a violent superstructure?

Traditionally, protests in South Africa originated in the townships were a racialized class dispute engulfed between a black working class against apartheid capitalism. Those protests had no formal rules and arrangements. It was purely masses of our people organizing themselves how they wanted and expressing the true extent of their tactics and emotions. Now because these protests have now moved from townships to the upper class suburbs in universities where the rich reside, suddenly there is now caution, coordination, application and control of how the black working class must protest in an “acceptable manner”. Any black protest that does not appreciate the standard set by the rich suburb is deemed “illegitimate” by the decorum. It is what Sibongile Mangolothi and David Fryer accurately describe as the system telling you that “this is how you are supposed to feel the pain, you are not supposed to feel the pain this way, this is how you are supposed to define the pain and you must prove beyond reasonable doubt that you are feeling the pain”

I ask again, in an antagonistic relationship described by an imbalance of power between two forces, the oppressor and the oppressed, who is illegitimate? The assertion by Prof Habib and NMMU of an "illegitimate student protest" is a myth and is completely invalid.

News24 Voices Terms & Conditions

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

AB praises selfless skipper

2010-11-21 18:15

Inside News24

 
/News
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.